Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 446CD83E.9050901@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? (Lukas Smith <smith@pooteeweet.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> I do agree that its probably not worth allocating core resources to > this, but spouting outdated FUD is really making you two look foolish. And which FUD would this be? > > You have to understand that MySQL evolves just like PostgreSQL does. So > you better focus on advertising where PostgreSQL shines instead of > poking fun at something you apparently do not follow. Uhmmm, I am not even going to bother responding to this part. It is obvious that *you* don't follow MySQL versus PostgreSQL. No offense but the development models and thus evolution thereof are completely different. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > regards, > Lukas > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutionssince 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: