Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
От | Lukas Kahwe Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 446CD806.1050700@pooteeweet.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
David Fetter wrote: > On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 09:58:21PM +0200, Lukas Smith wrote: > In what way is this outdated? Please provide a specific example. see below .. >> You have to understand that MySQL evolves just like PostgreSQL does. > > If it were true, I would have to understand it, but the way MySQL > evolves is not even remotely like the way PostgreSQL does. Here are a > few concrete differences: Ok, I was not trying to imply that MySQL evolves in the same way .. only that it also evolves. > You've made some sweeping allegations here and no specifics. sweeping allegations? http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/server-sql-mode.html SET [GLOBAL|SESSION] sql_mode='ALLOW_INVALID_DATES' That being said the solution is still lacking. I even filed a bug report over this: http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=17998 So I guess you can continue your commentary. Anyways, it was not my intention to educate PostgreSQL developers about MySQL, only that it would be wise not to make general comments about MySQL if you do not follow its development. regards, Lukas
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: