Re: Compression and on-disk sorting
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Compression and on-disk sorting |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4469200D.7000104@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Compression and on-disk sorting (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Compression and on-disk sorting
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com> writes: >> I think the real reason Oracle and others practically re-wrote >> their own VM-system and filesystems is that at the time it was >> important for them to run under Windows98; where it was rather >> easy to write better filesystems than your customer's OS was >> bundled with. > > Windows98? No, those decisions predate any thought of running Oracle > on Windows, probably by decades. But I think the thought process was > about as above whenever they did make it; they were running on some > pretty stupid OSes way back when. Windows XP? ****runs**** > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: