Re: GUI Interface
От | Thomas Hallgren |
---|---|
Тема | Re: GUI Interface |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4465854B.6080401@tada.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: GUI Interface (Dan Armbrust <daniel.armbrust.list@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Dan Armbrust wrote: > You live in an interesting world... meanwhile, I'm here in the real > world, using Eclipse - the best IDE I've ever used to develop java > applications. Oh, wait, Eclipse is written in Java? I didn't think it > was possible to write good apps in java? Certainly better than visual > studio (and yes, I have to use both - eclipse is a far better IDE in my > opinion). Oh, and I can run eclipse on my linux desktop as well as my > windows desktop? Thats just cool. Oh, and my next machine? Definitely > a Mac. And it woks there too - just like all of my SWT apps do. > > I will admit, it is rather easy to write slow java swing applications > There are a lot of poor ones out there. Its a shame that Sun botched > swing so badly, and have never repaired it properly. Its not impossible > to write fast, responsive apps in swing, it just takes skilled > developers. And its a pain. > > However, now with the emergence of SWT and modern JVM's - there is no > reason for your java GUI to be any slower than anything else. The only > excuse for a slow java app these days is the quality of the code that it > is built with. And you can write a bad, slow app in any language. > Cool. At least one that actually knows what he's talking about and have real life experience. I'm also using Eclipse and a slew of other Java apps. No complaints whatsoever on performance. Not too happy about all C/C++ apps that crash on illegal memory access though... +1 (or 10) for Java on the desktop. I will not spend time on a war that cannot be fought in this forum. Just wanted to air my opinion this once :-) Regards, Thomas Hallgren
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: