Re: XLOG_BLCKSZ vs. wal_buffers table
| От | Mark Wong |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: XLOG_BLCKSZ vs. wal_buffers table |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 44639631.4090802@osdl.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: XLOG_BLCKSZ vs. wal_buffers table (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote: > On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 09:55 -0700, Mark Wong wrote: >> Simon Riggs wrote: >>> Could you turn full_page_writes = off and do a few more tests? I think >>> the full page writes is swamping the xlog and masking the performance we >>> might see for normal small xlog writes. >>> I'd try XLOG_BLCKSZ = 4096 and 8192 to start with. Thanks. >> Ok, got data for XLOG_BLCKXZ at 4096, 8192, and 32768 with >> full_page_wirtes = off. The new data is at the bottom of the page: >> http://developer.osdl.org/markw/pgsql/xlog_blcksz.html > > Mark, > > What do you think is causing the step changes at 30+ and 60+ minutes on > these tests? > I'm at a loss to explain this myself. The increase in the i/o wait and decrease in the response time charts looks backwards to me. And the vmstat charts show that the i/o seems fairly consistent other than spikes in i/o chart. It sort of looks like the operating system stopped doing something but I'm not sure how to isolate that any further. Anyone else have a theory? Mark
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: