Re: in memory views
От | Thomas Vatter |
---|---|
Тема | Re: in memory views |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44627250.5010908@network-inventory.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: in memory views (Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Kris Jurka wrote: > > > On Wed, 10 May 2006, Thomas Vatter wrote: > >> Yes, the difference between psql command line and application is 6 >> seconds to 40 seconds. It is exactly the step resultSet = >> excecuteQuery() that needs 40 seconds. I use next() as a cursor >> through the resultSet, but I fear this is not enough, do I have to >> use createStatement(resultSetType, resultSetConcurrency) respectively >> prepareStatement (resultSetType, resultSetConcurrency) to achieve the >> cursor behaviour? > > > http://jdbc.postgresql.org/documentation/81/query.html#query-with-cursor > > Kris Jurka I was just returning to my mailbox to report success, I was just a bit faster than your e-mail, I have found the fetchSize function, it reduces the delay to 6 seconds. thanks a lot to all who helped, this was really great support, I am glad that the problem is solved tom
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: