Re: [PATCH] Honor PG_TEST_NOCLEAN for tempdirs
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Honor PG_TEST_NOCLEAN for tempdirs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44575677-27f5-ae40-32da-a8c93166659e@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Honor PG_TEST_NOCLEAN for tempdirs (Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2023-06-27 Tu 11:54, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:On 2023-06-26 Mo 19:55, Jacob Champion wrote:Hello, I was running the test_pg_dump extension suite, and I got annoyed that I couldn't keep it from deleting its dump artifacts after a successful run. Here's a patch to make use of PG_TEST_NOCLEAN (which currently covers the test cluster's base directory) with the Test::Utils tempdirs too. (Looks like this idea was also discussed last year [1]; let me know if I missed any more recent suggestions.)- CLEANUP => 1); + CLEANUP => not defined $ENV{'PG_TEST_NOCLEAN'}); This doesn't look quite right. If PG_TEST_CLEAN had a value of 0 we would still do the cleanup. I would probably use something like: CLEANUP => $ENV{'PG_TEST_NOCLEAN'} // 1 i.e. if it's not defined at all or has a value of undef, do the cleanup, otherwise use the value.If the environment varible were used as a boolean, it should be CLEANUP => not $ENV{PG_TEST_NOCLEAN} since `not undef` returns true with no warning, and the senses of the two flags are inverted. However, the docs (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/regress-tap.html#REGRESS-TAP-VARS) say "If the environment variable PG_TEST_NOCLEAN is set", not "is set to a true value", and the existing test in PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster's END block is: # skip clean if we are requested to retain the basedir next if defined $ENV{'PG_TEST_NOCLEAN'}; So the original `not defined` test is consistent with that.
ok, but ...
I think it's unwise to encourage setting environment variables without values. Some years ago I had to work around some ugly warnings in buildfarm logs by removing one such. I guess in the end it's a minor issue, but if someone actually sets it to 0 it would seem to me like a POLA violation still to skip the cleanup.
cheers
andew
-- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: