Re: New system recommendations
От | Robin Iddon |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New system recommendations |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 445110EA.9050703@edesix.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: New system recommendations (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: New system recommendations
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
> Anytime you're looking at a high write load on a database (not just > PostgreSQL) you should be looking at a hardware RAID controller with > battery backed cache and RAID 1 or RAID 1+0. > We recently benchmarked the latest and greatest PCI-X SATA mega raid controller (with NCQ support, so approaching SCSI performance) and we found it was no faster than running s/w RAID-1 on a dual-core P4 with the 2.6 series kernel. It would no doubt offer an advantage on running RAID-5 or any other RAID scheme that required XOR computation, but we don't want to use RAID-5. However we did not fit the Transportable Battery Backup Unit and so we didn't measure the benefit of early commit to the cache (fsync() returns early, data is written to disk later, battery keeps data safe in the meanwhile). I plan on repeating the experiment again later on in May once we have a TBBU and will post the results here if anyone is interested. Best wishes, Robin
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: