Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 444E8DD8.3040504@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs (David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
David Boreham wrote: > >> Actually, that was from an article from this last month that compared >> the dual core intel to the amd. for every dollar spent on the intel, >> you got about half the performance of the amd. Not bigotry. fact. >> >> But don't believe me or the other people who've seen the difference. Go >> buy the Intel box. No skin off my back. >> > I've been doing plenty of performance evaluation on a parallel application > we're developing here : on Dual Core Opterons, P4, P4D. I can say that > the Opterons open up a can of wupass on the Intel processors. Almost 2x > the performance on our application vs. what the SpecCPU numbers would > suggest. Because Stone Cold Said So! > > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: