Re: probable faq: internal format of numerics
От | Brian Hurt |
---|---|
Тема | Re: probable faq: internal format of numerics |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 444E48AC.2060903@janestcapital.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: probable faq: internal format of numerics (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: probable faq: internal format of numerics
|
Список | pgsql-novice |
Tom Lane wrote:
This is what I was hoping to not do. It's generally not possible to understand a peice of a project out of context- even well commented and well structured code like the Postgres code looks to be.
That said, it looks like they're doing a variant of my #2- they're holding 5 decimal digits every 2 bytes, plus an extra byte or so for the sign. But consider the NumericVar structure defined in numeric.c- is one of those stored with every row of a table, or are most of the values stored once per table and only the digits stored in the row? From a cursory reading of the code, it's hard for me to tell.
Brian
Brian Hurt <bhurt@janestcapital.com> writes:This is probably a FAQ, but I've googled the question and haven't found an answer. What is the internal format of numerics?"Use the source, Luke"
This is what I was hoping to not do. It's generally not possible to understand a peice of a project out of context- even well commented and well structured code like the Postgres code looks to be.
That said, it looks like they're doing a variant of my #2- they're holding 5 decimal digits every 2 bytes, plus an extra byte or so for the sign. But consider the NumericVar structure defined in numeric.c- is one of those stored with every row of a table, or are most of the values stored once per table and only the digits stored in the row? From a cursory reading of the code, it's hard for me to tell.
Brian
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: