Re: Hardware: HP StorageWorks MSA 1500
От | Mark Kirkwood |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hardware: HP StorageWorks MSA 1500 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 444D65EE.6040605@paradise.net.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hardware: HP StorageWorks MSA 1500 ("Mikael Carneholm" <Mikael.Carneholm@WirelessCar.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hardware: HP StorageWorks MSA 1500
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Mikael Carneholm wrote: > >> There are two SCSI U320 buses, with seven bays on each. I don't know > what the overhead of SCSI is, but you're obviously not going to get > > 490MB/s for each set of seven even if the FC could do it. > You should be able to get close to 300Mb/s on each SCSI bus - provided the PCI bus on the motherboard is 64-bit and runs at 133Mhz or better (64-bit and 66Mhz give you a 524Mb/s limit). > >> Of course your database may not spend all day doing sequential scans > one at a time over 14 disks, so it doesn't necessarily matter... > Yeah, it depends on the intended workload, but at some point most databases end up IO bound... so you really want to ensure the IO system is as capable as possible IMHO. > > That's probably true, but *knowing* that the max seq scan speed is that > high gives you some confidence (true or fake) that the hardware will be > sufficient the next 2 years or so. So, if dual 2GBit FC:s still don't > deliver more than 200Mb/s, what does? > Most modern PCI-X or PCIe RAID cards will do better than 200Mb/s (e.g. 3Ware 9550SX will do ~800Mb/s). By way of comparison my old PIII with a Promise TX4000 plus 4 IDE drives will do 215Mb/s...so being throttled to 200Mb/s on modern hardware seems unwise to me. Cheers Mark
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: