Re: Inserts optimization?
От | Markus Schaber |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Inserts optimization? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44462849.3070209@logix-tt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Inserts optimization? ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Inserts optimization?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Hi, Magnus, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Bacula already serializes access to the database (they have to support > mysql/myisam), so this shouldn't help. Ouch, that hurts. To support mysql, they break performance for _every other_ database system? <cynism> Now, I understand how the mysql people manage to spread the legend of mysql being fast. They convince software developers to thwart all others. </> Seriously: How can we convince developers to either fix MySQL or abandon and replace it with a database, instead of crippling client software? > Actually, it might well hurt by introducing extra delays. Well, if you read the documentation, you will see that it will only wait if there are at least commit_siblings other transactions active. So when Bacula serializes access, there will be no delays, as there is only a single transaction alive. HTH Markus -- Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS Fight against software patents in EU! www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: