Re: Is a high tab_reloid worrying?
От | John Sidney-Woollett |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is a high tab_reloid worrying? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 443E59DF.5080301@wardbrook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is a high tab_reloid worrying? (Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Thanks for the reassurance. You're right the db has been around for a while. Doea anyone know if OIDs for data and system (DDL) objects from the same number generator? John Christopher Browne wrote: > In an attempt to throw the authorities off his trail, johnsw@wardbrook.com (John Sidney-Woollett) transmitted: > >>I just added a new table to a slony relication set. The new table >>seems to have a really high tab_reloid value of 94,198,669 > > > I presume the database instance has been around for a while? If so, > then I wouldn't worry too much. > > I'm not certain comprehensively what would consume OIDs, but I expect > temp tables would, so if you have applications that generate them, > that would naturally lead to increases in OID values. > > The only time you get *low* values is if you define tables immediately > after creating the database.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: