Re: pg 8.1.3, AIX, huge box, painfully slow.
От | Richard Huxton |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg 8.1.3, AIX, huge box, painfully slow. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 443A2021.5070105@archonet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg 8.1.3, AIX, huge box, painfully slow. (Gavin Hamill <gdh@laterooms.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Gavin Hamill wrote: > On Fri, 07 Apr 2006 15:24:18 -0500 > Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com> wrote: > >>> See reply to Tom Lane :) >> I didn't see one go by yet... Could be sitting in the queue. > > If it's not arrived by now - EXPLAIN ANALYZE doesn't tell me > anything :) > >> Let us know if changing the fsync setting helps. Hopefully that's all >> the problem is. > > fsync's already off - yes a bit scary, but our I/O is only about > 500KB/sec writing.. the whole db fits in RAM / kernel disk cache, and > I'd rather have performance than security at this exact moment.. >>> Multi-Opteron was the other thing we considered but decided to give >>> 'Big Iron' UNIX a whirl... >> It still might be a good choice, if it's a simple misconfiguration >> issue. >> >> But man, those new multiple core opterons can make some impressive >> machines for very little money. > > So I see - we could buy two quad-opterons for the cost of renting this > pSeries for a month.... I don't know about the pSeries, but I had a client the other week with the same usage pattern. They made the switch from a quad Xeon to dual (+dual-core) Opteron and were extremely impressed. I can probably put you in touch with their sysadmin - contact me off-list if you'd like that. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: