Re: [SUGGESTION] CVSync

Bruce Momjian wrote:

>Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>  
>
>>I don't know what unreasonable infrastructure you are referring to. 
>>Building cvsup is a major pain, but installing and running it isn't, in 
>>my experience. There's a package in Fedora Extras. Setting up cvsweb 
>>against my cvsup repo is a fine idea - I wonder why I didn't think of that.
>>    
>>
>
>Using someone else's binary isn't an attractive alternative for open
>source users.
>
>  
>

Really? I haven't built the compiler, or make, or almost anything else 
in the toolset we use on any of the platforms I build on (FC*, Windows, 
Cygwin). So I use binaries built by other peoiple all the time. I bet 
you do too. In any case, cvsup would only be a supplement to cvs, not a 
replacement, and probably only of interest to developers, not users. 
It's not like cvsup is proprietary.

And we support cvsup right now - it's particularly nice with buildfarm.

cheers

andrew