Re: have you feel anything when you read this ?
От | Eugene E. |
---|---|
Тема | Re: have you feel anything when you read this ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44351590.7050506@bankir.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: have you feel anything when you read this ? (Markus Schaber <schabi@logix-tt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: have you feel anything when you read this ?
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
Markus Schaber wrote: > Hi, Eugene, > > Eugene E. wrote: > > >>>Okay, now pass that to strcmp or a %s format. AFAIK, the >>>"textual-form" of >>>values is meant to be a c-string. "ab\0cd\0" is not a c-string containing >>>ab\0cd, it's a c-string containing ab. >> >>WHY strcmp ?! do you really think the user is a fool ? >>if the user declared something "binary", he obviously knows what he has >>done. > > > But when the user requests the canonical _text_ representation of a byte > area data type, why do you consider him declaring it "binary"? he did not request this representation. it is _by_default_ if you wish to provide it by request, please do it. i ask you to provide minimal convertion by default, mentioned the user wants his data unchanged. and let the user interpret his own data himself. >>Since this structure provides a length of each value, you have no need >>in c-string. Why do think the user needs it ? > > A user that does not have a need in C-Strings can fetch the binary > representation, getting higher efficency for all datatypes. and lose the pretty good representation of all other columns in the same request. >>"textual-form" is just a name of actually existent convertion rule. >>i am not trying to find out a philosophy here. > > There is no philosophy but orthogonality. > > There's a textual and a binary form of datatypes. For varchar, byta, > int4, float, PostGIS geometries etc... good. i ask you to slightly change "textual" representation of bytea. > The text representation is pretty useful for human readers for _most_ > datatypes, the binary representation is much easier to parse for programs. You are right. but Who said that i can not display something ? i thougth, human-readability of some data depends completely on how CLIENT-SIDE interpret it. server do not know and should not know what data is human readable or printable... etc. > So use the binary representation for everything if you don't want to > display the data to the user directly. The problem we discuss is not about displaing or printig at all. Some applications want "textual-form" -- most applications but not only to display and in the _same_ query the same applications want bytea...
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: