Re: Sun Fire T2000 and PostgreSQL 8.1.3
От | Leigh Dyer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Sun Fire T2000 and PostgreSQL 8.1.3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44349D44.10902@eclinic.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Sun Fire T2000 and PostgreSQL 8.1.3 ("Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Sun Fire T2000 and PostgreSQL 8.1.3
Re: Sun Fire T2000 and PostgreSQL 8.1.3 |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Luke Lonergan wrote: > Leigh, > > On 4/5/06 9:23 PM, "Leigh Dyer" <leigh@eclinic.com.au> wrote: > >> We've got a Sun Fire V40z and it's quite a nice machine -- 6x 15krpm >> drives, 4GB RAM, and a pair of Opteron 850s. This gives us more than >> enough power now for what we need, but it's nice to know that we can >> shoehorn a lot more RAM, and up it to eight CPU cores if needed. > > We have one of these too - ours is signed by Scott McNealy. > Nice :) >> The newer Sun Opteron systems look nice too, but unless you're using >> external storage, their little 2.5" hard drives may not be ideal. > > Yes - but they end-of-lifed the V20z and V40z! > That's quite disappointing to hear -- our V40z isn't even six months old! We're not a big company, so external storage solutions are outside our price range, but we still wanted a nice brand-name box, and the V40z was a great deal compared to smaller boxes like the HP DL385. > One big problem with the sun line in general is the tiny internal storage > capacity - already too small on the V40z at 5/6 drives, now ridiculous at 4 > SAS drives on the galaxy series. I'm sure those little SAS drives would be great for web servers and other non-IO-intensive tasks though -- I'd love to get some X4100s in to replace our Poweredge 1750s for that. It's a smart move overall IMHO, but it's certainly not great for database serving. Thanks Leigh > > - Luke >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: