Re: Sun Fire T2000 and PostgreSQL 8.1.3
От | Robert Lor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Sun Fire T2000 and PostgreSQL 8.1.3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44348DDC.60505@sun.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Sun Fire T2000 and PostgreSQL 8.1.3 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Tom is right. Unless your workload can generate lots of simultaneous queries, you will not reap the full benefit of the Sun Fire T2000 system. I have tested 8.1.3 with an OLTP workload on an 8 cores system. With 1500-2000 client connections, the CPU was only about 30% utilized. The UltraSPARC T1 processor was designed for throughput with many cores running at lower frequency (1-1.2 GHz) to reduce power consumption. To speed up a single big query, you'd be better off with a parallelize DB or an Opteron system with higher clock speed like this one http://www.sun.com/servers/entry/x4200/ Regards, -Robert Tom Lane wrote: >"Juan Casero \(FL FLC\)" <Juan.Casero@wholefoods.com> writes: > > >>... This box has a single Ultrasparc T1 cpu with six execution >>piplelines that can each handle 4 threads. With the Unix top utility >>the postgresql server appears to bounce around between the available >>threads on the system. >> >> > >Try sending it more than one query at a time? If you're testing with >just one client connection issuing queries, that's about what I'd expect. > > regards, tom lane > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend > >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: