Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 442EA09B.1000602@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Suggestion: Which Binary? ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jim C. Nasby wrote: >On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 07:01:18PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > >>David Wheeler <david@kineticode.com> writes: >> >> >>>Yes, but even the environment variables get me what I want. I >>>therefore respectfully submit the attached patch to document them in >>>the INSTALL file. >>> >>> >>It seems rather pointless to document two instances of what is in fact >>a generic autoconf-script behavior ... >> >> > >The problem is that PostgreSQL is moving out of the realm of "hard-core >geeks only" and more into the mainstream. I'd bet a number of our users >have very little idea how autoconf and it's progeny work. It's probably >not unlikely that those folks would be able to figure out where their >perl was, but then not know how to tell it to configure. > > Most such users would use a binary distribution, though - either from the OS supplier or from our collection of binaries. If people are going to build postgres themselves from source then I *do* expect them to be moderately hard-core geeks. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: