Re: Additional current timestamp values

>>> On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at  7:58 pm, in message
<200603210158.k2L1wMY01170@candle.pha.pa.us>, Bruce Momjian
<pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> But not once per statement ---  in reality, you get a fairly
arbitrary
>> behavior that will advance in some cases and not others when
dealing
>> with a multi- statement querystring.

>> "statement" isn't a great name for the units
>> that we are actually processing.  We're really wanting to do these
>> things once per client command, or maybe per client query would be
a
>> better name.
>
> Right.

What about "query string"?  If you want to include the term "client", I
would find "client query string" less confusing than "client command" or
"client query".  If it's not always in the form of a string, maybe
"client xxx batch", where xxx could be statement, request, command, or
query.

-Kevin