Re: PostgreSQL client api
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL client api |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 442AEDAB.7030509@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL client api ("Antimon" <antimon@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL client api
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Antimon wrote: > Just noticed, > On windows, these results are produced. > But on linux, postgresql performs great. So postgre has a bad windows > integration than mysql. Well since it supports win32 for a long time, > it makes sense. > I did some "multi client" tests and postgre could not even catch mysql > so i decided to go test it on my linux box. It seems that the > performance issue is about windows version. Part of the problem may be the connection penalty on Windows. Since PostgreSQL is a processed based database (mySQL is threaded I believe) it is expensive (resource wise) to fire a bunch of connections. You may be able to get similar performance if you were to use pconnect or connection pooling with PHP and PostgreSQL. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: