Re: search.postgresql.org
От | Guillaume Smet |
---|---|
Тема | Re: search.postgresql.org |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44265C43.8010206@smet.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: search.postgresql.org ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
Dave Page wrote: > The config being shown is the one used for the main www.postgresql.org site search, thus results from that site are favouredover external sites. The archives are ranked even lower because of the potential for additional noise. Speaking of that, I noticed a problem a few days ago related to the scope of the search. You can reproduce it this way: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/index.html Search for alter table for example: http://search.postgresql.org/www.search?ul=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.postgresql.org%2Fdocs%2F8.1%2Finteractive%2F%25&fm=on&cs=utf-8&q=ALTER+TABLE You have 91 results and especially the results from the documentation. But when you click on the search button again on the results page, the ul parameter is not here anymore and you have pretty bad results: http://search.postgresql.org/www.search?cs=utf-8&fm=on&gr=on&o=0&ps=20&s=rate&q=ALTER+TABLE We have only 15 results and the documentation is not there. So we should probably keep the ul parameter in the new form when set in the query string but I don't understand why we don't have the doc results when ul is not there and I suspect the search should be global in this case. Regards, -- Guillaume
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: