Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 v. Oracle 10g xe
От | Oisin Glynn |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 v. Oracle 10g xe |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44239025.1010205@oisinglynn.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PostgreSQL 8.1 v. Oracle 10g xe (Chris Travers <chris@metatrontech.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Chris Travers wrote: > Recently I have been attempting to install Compiere. After spending a > lot of time attempting to get it to work, I have given up installing > it on PostgreSQL. I did however, get a little experience installing > JDBC and PL/Java in the mean time. > > I discovered in the process of attempting to install Oracle 10g > express edition that it is an extraordinary memory hog. One might > have thought that one might have something that might have lower > system requirements than the full version. However, this is not the > case. > > The installation itself is about 2GB (meaning you need at least 2GB of > free space and 352 MB RAM. The installation failed because it said I > needed at least 700MB swap space to install on Linux based on these > resources. Am I the only one who finds this disturbing? Why should > an RDBMS require so much swap space? > > After this experience, I have a much more profound appreciation for > the quality RDBMS that is PostgreSQL. PostgreSQL will install fine on > any of my computers if I need it to. > > In short, thanks guys for such an awesome RDBMS. PostgreSQL will > always remain my favorite. > > Best Wishes, > Chris Travers > Metatron Technology Consulting > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org > > I come from an Oracle 8.X/9.X on Windows background and to be honest we are moving towards Postgres for as many applications/projects as we can. We have to keep Oracle but now version Xe for the tougher to migrate parts and I have been shocked at how Oracle Xe slows down a medium spec pc/server. Oracle 8.x 9.x (Standard Edition) sure was slimmer!! And both were a factor fatter than 7.X Seems like maybe all the bloat was included and the features were just disabled. Roll on the happy day we dispense with Oracle completely. Many times a paid up Oracle support contract has been less help than searching the Postgres mailing list archives. And the mailing lists are probably as responsive to inquiry but with a more competent person answering the Postgres question. Oisin
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: