Re: question about the admin contrib module and binary
От | Tony Caduto |
---|---|
Тема | Re: question about the admin contrib module and binary |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4421C725.9050203@amsoftwaredesign.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: question about the admin contrib module and binary (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: question about the admin contrib module and binary
|
Список | pgsql-general |
> Which is one very good reason why it should be a separate RPM, no? If > it were in the contrib RPM then you could not install that RPM *at all* > on a machine that didn't have all of pgadmin's dependencies. I don't > know offhand what its dependencies are, but I'd imagine they include a > fair number of "GUI" packages. > > regards, tom lane > Hi Tom, I don't think it has any PG Admin dependencies, it's just a set of c functions that allow the user to manipulate files on the server. i.e. for updating the pg_hba.conf and the postgresql.conf. It needs a source install of Postgresql not pgAdmin to compile. All I am trying to say is that it should be included in this file: postgresql-contrib-8.1.3-1PGDG.i686.rpm so binary linux users can use it almost as easy as the binary win32 users. Later, Tony
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: