Re: Todo: Teach planner to evaluate multiple windows in the optimal order
От | Vik Fearing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Todo: Teach planner to evaluate multiple windows in the optimal order |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 441d135e-1941-c3ef-1649-18c3e8811549@postgresfriends.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Todo: Teach planner to evaluate multiple windows in the optimal order (Ankit Kumar Pandey <itsankitkp@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Todo: Teach planner to evaluate multiple windows in the optimal order
Re: Todo: Teach planner to evaluate multiple windows in the optimal order Re: Todo: Teach planner to evaluate multiple windows in the optimal order |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/4/23 13:07, Ankit Kumar Pandey wrote: > Also, one thing, consider the following query: > > explain analyze select row_number() over (order by a,b),count(*) over > (order by a) from abcd order by a,b,c; > > In this case, sorting is done on (a,b) followed by incremental sort on c > at final stage. > > If we do just one sort: a,b,c at first stage then there won't be need to > do another sort (incremental one). This could give incorrect results. Consider the following query: postgres=# select a, b, c, rank() over (order by a, b) from (values (1, 2, 1), (1, 2, 2), (1, 2, 1)) as abcd (a, b, c) order by a, b, c; a | b | c | rank ---+---+---+------ 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 (3 rows) If you change the window's ordering like you suggest, you get this different result: postgres=# select a, b, c, rank() over (order by a, b, c) from (values (1, 2, 1), (1, 2, 2), (1, 2, 1)) as abcd (a, b, c) order by a, b, c; a | b | c | rank ---+---+---+------ 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 (3 rows) -- Vik Fearing
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: