Re: Seperate command-line histories for seperate databases
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Seperate command-line histories for seperate databases |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 441B0A90.3080505@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Seperate command-line histories for seperate databases (Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Seperate command-line histories for seperate databases
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Chris Browne wrote: >mbertheau.pg@googlemail.com ("Markus Bertheau") writes: > > >>2006/3/17, Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>: >> >> >>>Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Bruce Momjian wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>The psql manual pages for 8.1 now has: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> \set HISTFILE ~/.psql_history- :DBNAME >>>>> >>>>> >>Any reason psql doesn't do this by default? It is clear that the >>database name does not unambiguously identify a database, but having a >>history for each database name is already an improvement over the >>current situation. >> >> > >I fairly frequently find myself accessing different (but similar) >databases, and it's quite valuable to be able to submit the *same* >queries to them. > >This change would make it troublesome to do that. I'd not be all that >keen on the change... > > Just what I was thinking. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: