Re: CREATE SYNONYM ...
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CREATE SYNONYM ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 441735DD.30407@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CREATE SYNONYM ... (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: CREATE SYNONYM ...
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote: >Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > > >>Even if they don't all have precisely the same semantics, though, is >>there an objection in principle to providing synonyms? >> >> > >The point I was trying to bring out is that they aren't standard, >which amounts to an objection in principle. I'd at least like to see >some effort made to demonstrate that we are adopting semantics that >match a majority of other DBs, rather than inventing something in a >vacuum which is what appears to be happening in this thread. > > > I agree. Maybe one of the proponents could put together a comparison matrix of how this is done in each of the databases previously mentioned. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: