Re: About updates
| От | Emi Lu |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: About updates |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4411A5B7.40500@encs.concordia.ca обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: About updates ("A. Kretschmer" <andreas.kretschmer@schollglas.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Thanks Andreas. That was a quick response. So way 1 must be quicker. >am 10.03.2006, um 10:46:39 -0500 mailte Emi Lu folgendes: > > >>Hello, >> >>postgresql 8.0.1, in a plpgsql function >> >>To update columns' values in a table (without OID), if I ran: >>1. "update table1 set col1 = ..., col2 = ... ... col100 =" >> >>or >>2. >>"update table1 set col1 = " >>... >>"update table1 set col100 = " >> >>way 1 only has one disk I/O, right? While way 2 is more time consuming >>since there is disk I/O when a update is ran. >> >> > >Because of MVCC every UPDATE is practical a DELETE + INSERT. >Way1: you have only one DELETE+INSERT, Way2 one hundred, and you have >100 dead rows until the next VACUUM. > > >HTH, Andreas > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: