Re: Performance problem with timestamps in result sets
| От | Oliver Jowett |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Performance problem with timestamps in result sets |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 440EF1DC.9000702@opencloud.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Performance problem with timestamps in result sets ("Thomas Dudziak" <tomdzk@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Performance problem with timestamps in result sets
|
| Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Thomas Dudziak wrote: > In short, whenever the ResultSet contains a timestamp value, the JDBC > driver takes nearly one second to extract it > -> AbstractJdbc2ResultSet.getTimestamp(int) : 7130ms | 8190 calls > Now my question is, is there something to make this faster ? Nearly > 1sec for a ResulSet.getTimestamp call is too much for us. Your profiling numbers show about 0.9 milliseconds per call, not 1 second per call, if I am reading them right? That's still slower than I would have expected, though. I did no profiling at the time I rewrote the timestamp stuff to actually work correctly. Perhaps you'd like to profile in more detail and submit some patches? -O
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: