Re: t1000/t2000 sun-servers
От | Jignesh K. Shah |
---|---|
Тема | Re: t1000/t2000 sun-servers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 440CB391.2090402@sun.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: t1000/t2000 sun-servers (Guido Neitzer <guido.neitzer@pharmaline.de>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
pgbench according to me is more io write intensive benchmark. T2000 with its internal drive may not perform well with pgbench with a high load. If you are using external storage, try it out. I havent tried it out yet but let me know what you see. -Jignesh Guido Neitzer wrote: > On 06.03.2006, at 21:10 Uhr, Jignesh K. Shah wrote: > >> Like migrate all your postgresql databases to one T2000. You might >> see that your average response time may not be faster but it can >> handle probably all your databases migrated to one T2000. >> >> In essence, your single thread performance will not speed up on Sun >> Fire T2000 but you can certainly use it to replace all your >> individual postgresql servers in your organization or see higher >> scalability in terms of number of users handled with 1 server with >> Sun Fire T2000. > > > How good is a pgbench test for evaluating things like this? I have > used it to compare several machines, operating systems and PostgreSQL > versions - but it was more or less just out of curiosity. The real > evaluation was made with "real life tests" - mostly scripts which > also tested the application server itself. > > But as it was it's easy to compare several machines with pgbench, I > just did the tests and they were interesting and reflected the real > world not as bad as I had thought from a "benchmark". > > So, personally I'm interested in a simple pgbench test - perhaps with > some more ( > 50) clients simulated ... > > cug
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: