Re: implement prepared queries in plperl

Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> Dmitry Karasik wrote:
>
>>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Is this patch going to be applied?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I am waiting for an update from Dmitry.
>>> cheers
>>> andrew
>>>
>>
>>
>> I believe this is some kind of misunderstanding, sorry if from my part,
>> but I don't think any further updates are necessary.
>>
>>
>
> OK, I'll take another look. I'm still curious to know why pltcl
> doesn't need to call spi_free_plan. Maybe it does need to ...
>
>

I have committed the patch and docs for this - it's an important feature
and I would like people banging on it.

I'd like to review the API we provide to plperl, though - I don't like
it much. I think that should be an 8.2 TODO.

cheers

andrew