PG Extensions: Must be statically linked?
От | Craig A. James |
---|---|
Тема | PG Extensions: Must be statically linked? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44076707.8030804@modgraph-usa.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: PG Extensions: Must be statically linked?
Re: PG Extensions: Must be statically linked? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I'm creating user-defined server extensions, written in C per the manual "31.9. C-Language Functions". Everything workswell, but only if I fully link the .so such that there are *no* unresolved external references at all. Not even thestuff in libstdc++.a can be left out. I've tried setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH everywhere possible, with no luck. Here's themake(1) line I have to use to link: libmyfuncs.so.0.0:gcc -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith \ -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wold-style-definition-Wendif-labels \ -fno-strict-aliasing -fpic -shared -Wl,-soname,libmyfuncs.so.0 \ $(OBJS) \ $(MYLIB)/lib/libmylibs.a\ /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.2/libstdc++.a \ -o libmyfuncs.so.0.0 Is this correct? Do Postgres extension need to be fully statically linked? Or is there some configuration that will specifyLD_LIBRARY_PATH (or perhaps a Postgres-specific equivalent). The manual's instructions are good regarding writing code, but don't say much about linking. Thanks, Craig
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: