Re: Index usage btree+gist ?
| От | Arnaud Lesauvage |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Index usage btree+gist ? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 43F5E65F.4050704@freesurf.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Index usage btree+gist ? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Index usage btree+gist ?
|
| Список | pgsql-novice |
Tom Lane a écrit : > Arnaud Lesauvage <thewild@freesurf.fr> writes: >> I have a table with a lot of rows (~3.000.000 I believe), and two >> indexes. >> The first one is a BTree index on a column (lets call it >> btreecolumn) which contains only 8 different integer values (from >> 0 to 8). > > An index as unselective as that is almost useless. It's not surprising > that the planner doesn't think it's worth the trouble to use it. OK, thanks for pointing this out. I was advised the PostGis list to use a multicolumn index on both the integer column and the geometry column. Another suggestion was to cluster the table on the gist-geometry index. What do you think about that ? Regards -- Arnaud
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: