Re: Oracle tried to buy MySQL
От | Ron Mayer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Oracle tried to buy MySQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 43F50F0D.5090802@cheapcomplexdevices.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Oracle tried to buy MySQL (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
David Fetter wrote: >> This probably means that the just bought Sleepycat and Innobase in >> an attempt to scare MySQL into a lower price. ... > > I doubt that Oracle is unaware of the players and their roles in > PostgreSQL's developer organization. I think it's more a matter of BDB & InnoDB and MySQL's customers that makes Oracle look there rather than here. Consider that with Sleepycat now Oracle can claim Google's Gmail is powered by Oracle technology Microsoft's Groove is powered by Oracle technology Amazon's A9Search is powered by Oracle technology AOL search is powered by Oracle technology Yahoo's Finance is poweredby Oracle technology while previously they had little traction in the high-traffic web space. (I had someone criticize an oracle-based dotcom company we were trying to sell with the comment "Oracle may scale technologically, but it doesn't scale financially".) And I'm not aware if before BDB Oracle had any embeddable products like those used in EMC's storage appliances and Sony's set-top boxes (which both use BDB) And with InnoDB they can claim Sabre / Travelocity, etc. I think they had a product-gap in that area, and went for the players with the biggest customer list there. I still bet that any Postgresql-based-company that had advertised comparable customer list would get Oracle offers very quickly.
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: