Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe"
От | Chris |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 43F3EDB0.70008@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe" ("Uwe C. Schroeder" <uwe@oss4u.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe"
Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe" |
Список | pgsql-general |
>>Then, even if you do write something to use postgresql a lot of hosts >>don't support it anyway ('mysql is good enough').. so you're stuck. > > Well, I guess the moment all the hoster's have to buy commercial licenses for > providing a database they'll switch to PG in no time - or charge more for the > people who absolutely need mysql. > Maybe it's time to write a sophisticated "mysql to postgresql" automation > tool.... Converting the database itself is easy (there's a few scripts in contrib and I've written one myself). The hard stuff is converting stuff like mysql's "last_insert_id" to a postgres alternative, fixing queries that aren't standard.. eg mysql doesn't force you to group by all columns being selected - I can do: select field1, field2, field3 from table group by field1; and have it valid in mysql (but of course postgres will tell you it's not valid and need to add grouping for field2 and field3). mysql 5 is the first version where you can enforce "not null" constraints, before that you could do: create table a(a int, b int not null); insert into a(a) values('1'); and it would accept it (even though 'b' doesn't have a default value), so some code could be rather "dodgy" for lack of a better term. The list goes on about differences (date handling, full text indexing for example).
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: