Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe"
От | Chris |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 43F3E84D.1030703@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe" (Leonard Soetedjo <stelar@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe"
|
Список | pgsql-general |
> And since MySQL already has got the upperhand in terms of marketing, Oracle > would buy MySQL to make it as the low-end alternative. Never mind the > lack/immature features in MySQL such as stored proc or trigger. Mysql 5 has stored procedures and triggers. The fact that you have to change between different "storage engines" to use transactions properly etc is a little weird (and some of the new engines are just bizarre), but that's beside the point. 90% of open-source software is written to use only mysql (and it's not easy to switch to another db) - search freshmeat or sourceforge for anything postgresql related.. not much there. Then, even if you do write something to use postgresql a lot of hosts don't support it anyway ('mysql is good enough').. so you're stuck.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: