Re: Reliability recommendations
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Reliability recommendations |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 43F36D51.5090502@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Reliability recommendations ("Jeremy Haile" <jhaile@fastmail.fm>) |
Ответы |
Re: Reliability recommendations
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Jeremy Haile wrote: > We are a small company looking to put together the most cost effective > solution for our production database environment. Currently in > production Postgres 8.1 is running on this machine: > > Dell 2850 > 2 x 3.0 Ghz Xeon 800Mhz FSB 2MB Cache > 4 GB DDR2 400 Mhz > 2 x 73 GB 10K SCSI RAID 1 (for xlog and OS) > 4 x 146 GB 10K SCSI RAID 10 (for postgres data) > Perc4ei controller > > The above is a standard Dell box with nothing added or modified beyond > the options available directly through Dell. You should probably review the archives for PostgreSQL user experience with Dell's before you purchase one. > I sent our scenario to our sales team at Dell and they came back with > all manner of SAN, DAS, and configuration costing as much as $50k. > HAHAHAHAHA.... Don't do that. Dell is making the assumption you won't do your homework. Make sure you cross quote with IBM, Compaq and Penguin Computing... Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564 PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: