Re: Storing a kazillion small blobs in postgresql. Smart?
| От | Leonel Nunez | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Storing a kazillion small blobs in postgresql. Smart? | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 43EE2305.8060508@enelserver.com обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | Storing a kazillion small blobs in postgresql. Smart? (Stefan Arentz <stefan.arentz@norad.org>) | 
| Список | pgsql-general | 
Stefan Arentz wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm looking at the design for an application where i have to store > potentially many gigabytes worth of small blobs of varying sizes (8K - > 64K) in a database. I've always been told that it is smarter to store > references to files in the database, and I think that is true in a lot > of cases. But here I need this data to be transactional and probably > replicated so I'm looking into storing it directly in the db. > > I know this is all rather vague but I'm interested in more experienced > pgsql user's opinions about this. Is it smart? Would it work? Or would > something like this blow up the db? > > S. > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend > > well I store images and other files on the Database with ByteA fields works great leonel
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: