Re: Storing Digital Video
От | Craig A. James |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Storing Digital Video |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 43EB5D59.1030207@modgraph-usa.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Storing Digital Video (Nate Byrnes <nate@qabal.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Storing Digital Video
Re: Storing Digital Video |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Nate Byrnes wrote: > I must claim some ignorance, I come from the application world... but, > from a data integrity perspective, it makes a whole lot of sense to > store video, images, documents, whatever in the database rather than on > the file system external to it. Personally, I would use LOB's, but I do > not know the internals well enough to say LOBs or large columns. > Regardless, there are a lot of compelling reasons ranging from software > maintenance, disk management, data access control, single security layer > implementation, and so on which justify storing data like this in the > DB. Am I too much of an Oracle guy? Yes, you are too much of an Oracle guy ;-). Oracle got this notion that they could conquer the world, that EVERYTHING shouldbe in an Oracle database. I think they even built a SAMBA file system on top of Oracle. It's like a hammer manufacturertelling you the hammer is also good for screws and for gluing. It just ain't so. You can store videos in a database, but there will be a price. You're asking the database to do something that the filesystem is already exceptionally good at: store big files. You make one good point about security: A database can provide a single point of access control. Storing the videos externallyrequires a second mechanism. That's not necessarily bad -- you probably have a middleware layer, which can ensurethat it won't deliver the goods unless the user has successfully connected to the database. Craig
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: