Re: User Defined Types in Java
От | Thomas Hallgren |
---|---|
Тема | Re: User Defined Types in Java |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 43EB3B39.9050804@tada.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: User Defined Types in Java (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: User Defined Types in Java
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 01:08:01PM +0100, Thomas Hallgren wrote: >> Hi, >> I'd like to enable UDT's written in Java and made some initial trial and >> error. I don't get very far. Here's what I do: >> >> I take the 'complex' type example described in '31.11 User-Defined >> Types' and change it to use Java functions (see below). But I get: >> >> ERROR: type "complex" does not exist > > If you look at the code it says in a comment: > > /* > * Only C-coded functions can be I/O functions. We enforce this > * restriction here mainly to prevent littering the catalogs with > * shell types due to simple typos in user-defined function > * definitions. > */ > Ouch. Any chance of getting this changed? If we can agree on a good design I'd be happy to implement and submit it. > However, you could probably work around this like so: > > CREATE FUNCTION dummy(cstring) RETURNS complex AS [random existing > function] LANGUAGE INTERNAL; > > This will create the shell type. You then create your other functions > and finally the type, at which point you can delete the dummy function > again. > Great. Thanks. Then at least I can test if what I have in mind is feasible. > Roundabout, but it should work (I hope). Note, if you have a validator > on your java code that tries to lookup the return type, you might get > some interesting issues. > I don't yet. But I'll keep it in mind to watch out for shell types once I do. Regards, Thomas Hallgren
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: