Re: BUG #2225: Backend crash -- BIG table
От | Patrick Rotsaert |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #2225: Backend crash -- BIG table |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 43E0E88E.50004@arrowup.be обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #2225: Backend crash -- BIG table (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #2225: Backend crash -- BIG table
Re: BUG #2225: Backend crash -- BIG table |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Tom Lane wrote: >Patrick Rotsaert <patrick.rotsaert@arrowup.be> writes: > > >>on 31/01/2006 16:18 Tom Lane wrote : >> >> >>>http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/kernel-resources.html#AEN18105 >>> >>> > > > >>But /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory reads `0', so my guess is that >>overcommit is not enabled... right? >> >> > >Please read the reference I pointed you to. > > regards, tom lane > > I did read it, very carefully. The proposed fix will only work in 2.6 kernels. Mine is a 2.4 and upgrading it is not an option. The document suggests to look at the kernel source for 2.4 kernels. I did that, as I wrote in the previous mail. Setting the overcommit parameter to '2', or any value for that matter, won't do any good because in this kernel, it is only tested if it is non-zero. On my system, the parameter is 0, so overcommit is *not* enabled. I don't know what else I can do. The other proposed option is to install more memory. Sorry, not an option, 1GB has to be sufficient. Apart from the overcommit subject, why is postgres consuming so much memory? Should the solution of this problem not be searched for here? Thanks, Patrick Rotsaert
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: