Re: Huge Data sets, simple queries
От | Kevin |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Huge Data sets, simple queries |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 43DF9D93.3030602@drule.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Huge Data sets, simple queries ("Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Luke Lonergan wrote: > Jim, > > On 1/30/06 12:25 PM, "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com> wrote: > > >> Why divide by 2? A good raid controller should be able to send read >> requests to both drives out of the mirrored set to fully utilize the >> bandwidth. Of course, that probably won't come into play unless the OS >> decides that it's going to read-ahead fairly large chunks of the table >> at a time... >> > > I've not seen one that does, nor would it work in the general case IMO. In > RAID1 writes are duplicated and reads come from one of the copies. You > could alternate read service requests to minimize rotational latency, but > you can't improve bandwidth. > > - Luke > > For Solaris's software raid, the default settings for raid-1 sets is: round-robin read, parallel write. I assumed this mean't it would give similar read performance to raid-0, but I've never benchmarked it. -Kevin
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: