Re: Does this look ethical to you?
От | Tony Caduto |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Does this look ethical to you? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 43D64B71.1060406@amsoftwaredesign.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Does this look ethical to you? ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Does this look ethical to you?
Re: Does this look ethical to you? |
Список | pgsql-general |
Magnus Hagander wrote: > We (pginstaller hat goes on) don't know of any competing products. We > will be happy to consider bundling any competing product, including PG > Lightning Admin. One of the most important things in order to be > distributed as part of an open source product is that the parts are open > source. If PGLA (or a lite version if necessary) is available under an > OSS license, we'll definitly consider bundling it. > (We have considered bundling phpPgAdmin, but haven't found a good way to > do it without dragging in a huge load of dependencies) I don't wan't to be bundled, I just want it to be known that there are alternatives available. Postgresql is free, so what is the big deal about letting users know about alternative admin tools comercial or open source? It's not like it would put pgAdmin or Postgresql out of business(it could only help). It's a shame you don't see how the bundling of pgAdmin(in the current way) is hurting the 3rd party community. All that would be needed is a installer section at the end saying something like: In addition to pgAdmin III there are other opensource and commercial admin products available, you can get more information here <link back to postgresql home page>. I don't see that as being detrimental to anyone and would certainly be in fair play. -- Tony Caduto AM Software Design Home of PG Lightning Admin for Postgresql http://www.amsoftwaredesign.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: