Re: [PERFORMANCE] Stored Procedures
От | Rikard Pavelic |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PERFORMANCE] Stored Procedures |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 43D13C2F.1030203@zg.htnet.hr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PERFORMANCE] Stored Procedures ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PERFORMANCE] Stored Procedures
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Jim C. Nasby wrote: > My college professor said it, it must be true! ;P > > The famous joke ;) > My understanding is that in plpgsql, 'bare' queries get prepared and act > like prepared statements. IE: > > SELECT INTO variable > field > FROM table > WHERE condition = true > ; > > Unfortunately I don't know enough about PostgreSQL, but from responses I've been reading I've come to that conclusion. > Ok, so post some numbers then. It might be interesting to look at the > cost of preparing a statement, although AFAIK that does not store the > query plan anywhere. > > In most databases, query planning seems to be a pretty expensive > operation. My experience is that that isn't the case with PostgreSQL. > I didn't think about storing query plan anywhere on the disk, rather keep them in memory pool. It would be great if we had an option to use prepare statement for stored procedure so it would prepare it self the first time it's called and remained prepared until server shutdown or memory pool overflow. This would solve problems with prepare which is per session, so for prepared function to be optimal one must use same connection.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: