Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 43C2F652.3030901@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
It has probably been sufficiently mitigated on *nix. On Windows, the choice seems to be between living with the risk and trying my "put the locales back where they were" patch, which as Tom and Greg point out might have other consequences. Take your pick. cheers andrew Bruce Momjian wrote: >Is there a TODO here, even if the Perl folks are supposed to fix it? > >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > >>Tom Lane wrote: >> >> >> >>>>I'm just about out of ideas and right out of time to spend on this. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>We could just file a Perl bug report and wait for them to fix it. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>done >> >> >> >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: