Re: What bison versions are installed on buildfarm machines?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: What bison versions are installed on buildfarm machines? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 43B97845.9070005@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: What bison versions are installed on buildfarm machines? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: What bison versions are installed on buildfarm machines?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: >"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > > >>configure doesn't actually report the bison version, but it does complain if >>the version is less than 1.875, and I don't see that on rook. >> >> > >Sigh, I haven't woken up entirely today :-( ... of course, this is a >flex macro we are talking about, not bison. > >Our configure script does complain about flex 2.5.3, and I don't see >that warning in rook's output, but perhaps some even older flex version >is installed there? Hard to believe ... even 2.5.4 is pretty ancient. > > Not that hard to believe. 2.5.4 is what the major distributions are shipping. Even FC4 comes with 2.5.4a. The only reason I can see for this is that Flex is now considered a NON-GNU project. The currently supported Flex is up to 2.5.31. Joshua D. Drake > regards, tom lane > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster > > -- The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564 PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: