Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?

On Mar 24, 2011, at 5:23 PM, Claudio Freire wrote:
> I routinely have to work around query inefficiencies because GEQO does
> something odd - and since postgres gives me too few tools to tweak
> plans (increase statistics, use subqueries, rephrase joins, no direct
> tool before CTEs which are rather new), it becomes an art form, and it
> becomes very unpredictable and an administrative burden. Out of the
> blue, statistics change, queries that worked fine start to perform
> poorly, and sites go down.
>
> If GEQO could detect unsafe plans and work around them automatically,
> it would be a major improvement.

This isn't limited to GEQO queries either. Every few months we'll have what should be a very fast query suddenly become
farslower. Still on the order of seconds, but when you're running several of those a second and they normally take
fractionsof a second, this kind of performance degradation can easily bring a server to it's knees. Every time this has
happenedthe solution has been to re-analyze a fairly large table; even with default stats target of 1000 it's very easy
forone bad analyze to ruin your day.  
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect                   jim@nasby.net
512.569.9461 (cell)                         http://jim.nasby.net