Re: query from partitions
От | Richard Huxton |
---|---|
Тема | Re: query from partitions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 439EEFCF.8000505@archonet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | query from partitions (Ключников А.С. <alexs@analytic.mv.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: query from partitions
Re: query from partitions |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Ключников А.С. wrote: > And > select * from base > where id in (1,2) and datatime between '2005-05-15' and '2005-05-17'; > 10 seconds > > select * from base > where id in (select id from device where id = 1 or id = 2) and > datatime between '2005-05-15' and '2005-05-17'; > 10 minits > > Why? Run EXPLAIN ANALYSE on both queries to see how the plan has changed. My guess for why the plans are different is that in the first case your query ends up as ...where (id=1 or id=2)... In the second case, the planner doesn't know what it's going to get back from the subquery until it's executed it, so can't tell it just needs to scan base_1,base_2. Result: you'll scan all child tables of base. I think the planner will occasionally evaluate constants before planning, but I don't think it will ever execute a subquery and then re-plan the outer query based on those results. Of course, someone might pop up and tell me I'm wrong now... -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: