Re: Schema bug
От | Florian G. Pflug |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Schema bug |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4398DA8A.5080608@phlo.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Schema bug ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
Dave Page wrote: >>Andreas Pflug wrote: >>>Guillaume LELARGE wrote: >>>>Hi, >>>>I found a weird bug today. If you rename the public >>>>schema, it becomes >>>>unavailable. Here is a patch to fix it. It modifies the >>>>query to use >>>>the oid instead of the schema's name. Works great on >>>>Linux, should'nt >>>>be a problem on win32. >>> >>>Actually, to me renaming the public schema appears as the >>>primary bug... >>>There are many ways to corrupt pgAdmin's behaviour, and you >>>found one of >>>'em. Renaming public is so irregular, I doubt it's worth >>>changing the >>>behaviour. >> >>This argument scares me... I believe a GUI-Tool shouldn't impose any >>additional restrictions to what you can do with your database - >>otherwise GUI-Users become second-class citzicens when >>compared to those >>who use the commandline/psql. Why exactly does pgadmin depend on >>the existance of the public schema? > > The first thing that springs to mind is that we can only tell that it is > *not* a system schema from it's name. The normal test (oid < > LAST_SYSTEM_OID) doesn't work because it's created during (in > template1/template0 at least). Hm.. couldn't it check the system-schemas by name instead - so, saying "it's a non-system schema if it isn't called information_schema or pg_catalog", instead of "it's a system-schema if oid < LAST_SYSTEM_OID and name is not public"? Or are there other system schemas I don't know of (quite possible ;-) )? greetings, Florian Pflug
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: