Re: First Step to Major Use: Integrated Full-Text
От | Christopher Kings-Lynne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: First Step to Major Use: Integrated Full-Text |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4394EB32.8020202@familyhealth.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: First Step to Major Use: Integrated Full-Text ("C. Filipe Medeiros" <filipe@mercenary3.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: First Step to Major Use: Integrated Full-Text
Re: First Step to Major Use: Integrated Full-Text |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
> 2. MySQL supports full-text searching (not to mention > commercial-brand dbs like SQL Server 2005). Now that MySQL > supports transactions as well, there's less reason than ever for > web developers to build their applications with Postgres support. > Full-text search in Postgres (which as a contrib module is already > more functional than MySQL's integrated search) could make a huge > difference in database choice. Why be left behind when everyone > else is providing this functionality to their users? Although I agree with your arguments for integration, I should point out that MySQL's full text indexing and it's transactions are mutually exclusive. You can't have both. Chris
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: